There’s not much I can add to the one-year-later Sandy
retrospectives in the New York Times and other sources. They have covered many of the
short-term and long-term impacts to transportation and other types of
infrastructure.
Just two thoughts:
First, as some of us have pointed out (my comments a year
ago here), the silver lining to the Sandy disaster, and other weather related
disasters, could be that a growing majority of people involved in our public
policy discourse will be climate change believers, not Flat Earthers. I believe there have been signs of
that, although it’s discouraging when we see the prime minster of Australia,
whose country is literally on fire, holding steadfast to denial.
Second, it’s pretty clear that more and more public agencies
– DOTs and others – are seriously incorporating climate change resilience and
adaptation into their planning.
That will be very helpful in coping with future events.
Finally, just to give a little perspective, this photo shows
Sandy damage still visible a few weeks ago in a wildlife preserve along the
Delaware River about 60 miles inland.
Although the Jersey Shore and urban areas got the most news coverage in
the Sandy aftermath, the damage to inland rural areas and woodlands was immense.
No comments:
Post a Comment