After years of prep work New Jersey’s Pulaski Skyway is
closed for 2 years for major rehab work, costing upwards of $1 billion. Having been in at the beginning of this
project I’m happy to see it move forward, though it’s a complicated story. After spending that $1 billion (and
actually a lot more than that, when you add in all the extraordinary
maintenance costs over the past several years) we will have a 3 ½-mile long
structure connecting Newark with the Holland Tunnel, but not located where you
would put it today – and since it traverses miles of wetlands it would be
problematic to build it at all today.
In fact, if you were given $1 billion and told you could spend it
anywhere in New Jersey to improve mobility, you probably wouldn’t spend it
here.
The Pulaski Skyway is a piece of legacy infrastructure that’s
too important not to save, too expensive to tear down, doesn’t generate enough
traffic to impose tolls, and can’t handle trucks.
Are there lessons to be drawn from the Pulaski Skyway
project? I would say two: First, we have some major pieces of
legacy transportation infrastructure that are going to require some tough decision
making over the next several years.
Second, don’t try to draw too many lessons from big pieces that have so
many unique features.
No comments:
Post a Comment